Finally, ending years of speculation on whether he will run
for President, today, former Maryland Governor Larry Hogan announced he will
not run. He made this statement on National TV in a taped interview with Bob
Costas on Face the
Nation. Acknowledging that he is a Republican in the Ronald Reagan
conservative model, Hogan claims that although many in his party share these
views, not enough do.Additionally, he said that stepping back from running was a tough
decision, but he did not want to enable a victory by the former president in
the Republican primaries. The former governor noted that DJT and DeSantis appear to be the
front runners, with all the other candidates far behind, and believed that if
the primaries had many candidates as in 2016, DJT would emerge victorious,
which was a result he did not want to see. He would like to see the Republican Party
return to the party that he rose up in when he first ran for governor in Maryland.
But last year, the MD primary rejected his supported candidate for Governor,
Kelly Schultz, and instead chose a far-right “wing-nut”, as some described him,
to run for that post. The voters in MD rejected this candidate almost two to
one as the Democratic nominee emerged victorious in the general election.
Hogan further discussed the facts that the Republicans have
lost the popular vote in several recent elections and need to change if they
expect to win over voters. If this change does not occur, he sees years of
continued defeats for his party. He repeated the significance of the last
Presidential election where his party lost the House, the Senate, and the White
House, and warned that this could continue if the Party does not seek other
candidates with different views. About 30% of his party still supports the
former president, and they don’t want to change. Hogan stated he is a truth-teller,
and the party needs more of those. Obviously, he thinks little of those who
claim the previous election was stolen and continue to repeat those lies.
When asked in the interview if he would support former VP
Mike Pence, Hogan stated yes. Pence has boxed himself in, it seems, by claiming
Congressional immunity from answering a subpoena or testifying to the Grand Jury
in the investigation being run by special counsel Jack Smith. Since he has
already written and published a book addressing the events surrounding January
sixth, few pundits understand his reluctance. Many believe his argument is
reaching for straws and do not understand his reluctance to speak before the
Grand Jury. Possibly, writing something down differs significantly from
testifying under oath, who knows? If this proceeds to the Supreme Court, few
expect his argument will hold, since Senator Graham, with a better argument of
being an actual Senator, did not prevail in his quest to not have to testify in
the Georgia vote tampering case.
The Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) is in
town this week, or rather down at National Harbor for its annual CPAC
Convention. This used to be referred to as the conservative prom where all the
presidential hopefuls came to play and show off. However, this year there were
many no-shows as DeSantis, Senator Tim Scott, Senator Ted Cruz, Governor Sununu,
and several others were at the other conservative powerhouse event being held
by the Club
for Growth on the West Coast. The former president was not invited, so
reports say. Governor Youngkin and former Secretary Pompeo could not attend but
were also invited. At least, this time, the CPAC group did not hear from the
totalitarian leader, Viktor Orban of Hungary.
CPAC has had some problems this year as its’ leader, Matt
Schlapp, is facing charges
of sexual harassment by a Walker campaign volunteer who was assigned to drive
him around during the Georgia Senate campaign. Vanity Fair reports on this and
other concerns for the group in the link above. But, CPAC had Don Jr, Matt Gaetz,
Mike Lindell, (the pillow guy), Marjorie Taylor Greene, Jim Jordan, Mike
Pompeo, and the former president, so what more could anyone want? Former UN
Ambassador, Nikki Haley, also spoke in a pandering speech but was not well
received by the audience.
According to CNN,
DJT gave a rambling 90-minute speech where they documented at least 33
inaccuracies or lies. The
New York Times mentioned the same, noting he wildly inflated the murder and
crime rates in New York City. He also claimed that even if he were to be
indicted, he would still stay in the race for president. Still, he won a candidate
straw poll vote from meeting attendees with 66% of the vote. This was his crowd,
and even though the attendance was significantly lower than in previous years,
the fervent and faithful showed up.
What should we make of all of this? Well, it is early days
yet, primaries will not happen for another year and a lot can happen in a year.
With any luck, DJT will be behind bars by then. (Hey, I can dream, can’t I?) Many
say that DeSantis has yet to be tested on a national stage and, given his notoriously
thin skin, may flame out when challenged. Others note he is acting imperiously
as he ventures out of state and is trying to outdo the former president with
his inflammatory statements. Can this last; I doubt it, but time will tell. He
claims it is time to have the nation follow Florida’s’ example, but few voters
really know how extreme he has become in his actions there. Although this
nation was founded on principles of religious tolerance, some believe he is trying to make
Florida a Christian state. Not only is he attacking trans youth and LBGTQ
residents, but he also went after Disney for opposing him and supporting their Disney
World employees. I think he is also trying to create a totalitarian state. One
of his legislators
was even trying to outlaw the Democratic Party as a viable entity in Florida,
supposedly because “once upon a time” Florida Democrats supported slavery. And
that differs from DeSantis outlawing the teaching of slavery and the civil
rights movement, how? Continue to monitor DeSantis; he cannot be allowed to get
away with these antics.
Today, to commemorate the anniversary of the March across
the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama by Civil Rights activists, President
Biden spoke at the site. He advocated for voting rights and the passage of
the John Lewis Voting Rights legislation, which was defeated by a Senate
filibuster last year. If you remember, the police beat John Lewis severely at
that bridge and he suffered a fractured skull. Biden noted how many states had
restricted voting rights in recent years but lamented the fact that with this
House there was little chance to pass legislation now.
Heather
Cox Richardson wrote an excellent piece about this in her column tonight. She
spoke of the history surrounding that day, where after several marches and
attempts to vote, citizens were arrested, beaten, or given literacy tests that
none passed. Several civil rights groups organized a march that would start at
the bridge. The violence of that day led eventually to the passage of the 1965 Voting
rights act after a passionate speech and support by President Johnson.
Richardson
notes: “But less than 50 years later, in 2013, the Supreme Court
gutted the Voting Rights Act. The Shelby County v. Holder decision
opened the door, once again, for voter suppression. Since then, states have
made it harder to vote. In the wake of the 2020 election, in which voters
handed control of the government to Democrats, Republican-dominated
legislatures in at least 19 states passed 34 laws restricting access to voting.
In July 2021, in the Brnovich v.
Democratic National Committee decision, the Supreme Court
ruled that election laws that disproportionately affected minority voters were
not unconstitutional, so long as they were not intended to be racially
discriminatory.
When the Democrats took power in 2021, they vowed to strengthen
voting rights. They immediately introduced the For the People Act, which
expanded voting rights, limited the influence of money in politics, banned
partisan gerrymandering, and created new ethics rules for federal
officeholders. Republicans in the Senate blocked the measure with a filibuster.
Democrats then introduced the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act,
which would have restored portions of the Voting Rights Act, and the Freedom to
Vote Act, a lighter version of the For the People Act. Republicans blocked both
of those acts, too.
And so, in 2023, the right to vote is increasingly precarious.
As Biden told marchers today, “The right to vote—the right to
vote and to have your vote counted is the threshold of democracy and liberty.
With it, anything is possible. Without it—without that right, nothing is
possible. And this fundamental right remains under assault.”
So,
as I conclude, please remember that many Republicans believe it is correct to
decide who should vote and how and will continue to make laws to decrease the
right to vote. Brnovitch, as noted above, specifically targets Native Americans
who used to send in their votes through third parties since they live far from
traditional polls. This Supreme Court has been actively agreeing with
restrictive laws against the people and for the states.
So,
on that note, I will conclude my remarks tonight.
“Til
next week-Peace!
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are reviewed prior to posting.