The ancient Greek philosopher Diogenes was famously said to
walk the streets looking for an honest man. (They also described him as badly
lacking in manners and civil discourse and a man who had outbursts of public urination
and defecation!) So, I am uncertain just how he would define honesty. But,
since we have recently had a rash of public officials who were not familiar
with truth-telling, it is good to come across several people who have testified
honestly in the House Select Committee Hearings about January 6th.
Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger recorded the
call from the President and testified about that conversation where he was
asked to find 11,780 votes so that they could declare him the winner of Georgia’s
electoral votes. The Secretary could hardly get his explanation out in the
conversation with the former President when he explained the multiple counts
and ballot reviews. He also told the committee that one discrepancy was that
many people voted for other offices on the ballot but did not vote for any
candidate for president, leaving that ballot line blank so that other
candidates in some counties received more votes than the Office of the
President did. In his testimony, he spoke of the turmoil that resulted from
opposing this request. Phones for his family members were “doxed” and unknown
persons subjected them to cyberbullying and personal threats. He, his wife, and
other family members were physically threatened and his daughter-in-law’s home
was invaded. When asked why he just didn’t give up and quit, he simply answered
that he had to remain faithful to his job and the Constitution.
The Arizona Speaker of the House also testified about
pressures from the White House and its’ associates. He was not asked to find
more votes but was asked to call the Arizona House back into session, so it
could select a new set of presidential electors which would then cast votes in
the president’s favor, although Biden had won the state by several thousand
votes. He tried to explain that this was not something he could do subject to
state laws. He explained he had taken an oath to defend the Constitution and
his legislative office and could not go against this oath or his faith in
making that vow. He also described attacks against him and his family and protestors surrounding his home with loudspeakers defaming his character. Although I disagree with this official in his devotion to
former President Reagan, his personal conservatism, and his statement that if
DJT were to run again, he would vote for him, I have to applaud the fact that
his oath of office meant something to him; (even though the oath taken by the
former president apparently meant nothing in his case).
Several officials from the Department of Justice also gave
testimony in the Committee hearings.
NPR
reports that “former Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, former acting Deputy
Attorney General Richard Donoghue, and former Office of Legal Counsel head
Steven Engel all testified before the committee about the pressure they faced
to use their positions at the Justice Department (DOJ) to help then-President
Trump overturn his election loss.”
They mentioned daily phone
calls from the White House to call the election fraudulent or to investigate
ever-increasing conspiratorial claims, all of which were proven false. They
explained they had even been told to just find fraud; the White House would
take care of the rest. When they learned of a plan in transition from the
president to name as a new acting Attorney General (AG), an inexperienced DOJ
environmental attorney named Jeffrey Clark who was ready to do the President’s
bidding, the upper staff of the Department of Justice uniformly threatened to
resign. Rep Scott Perry, from PA, brought Clark to the attention of the
president as one who would be on the team. Clark had prepared a letter for
Rosen’s signature that would have been sent to several states and stated that
the DOJ had found enough evidence to decertify the election and encouraged the
states to choose new electors. Since none of this was true, Rosen, who was
asked by the president to serve under Clark (preposterous!) showed that the
senior staff would all resign if they put this unqualified person in the AG
office. The president dropped this plan in the face of this collective action.
These three officials all spoke about the integrity of the department and how
moves such as this would threaten the independence and reputation of Justice.
Here again, truth-telling and integrity are valued, as are the oaths the staff
attorneys take to serve.
The NPR analysis criticized
the DOJ senior officials for not going public with this episode of coercion by
the president, which has been called a scheme leading to a constitutional
crisis. Interestingly, Perry (who denied this) and several other members of Congress
requested advance pardons that were not granted. Congressman Mo Brooks (who
wore body armor and spoke at the Jan 6th rally) requested blanket
pardons for all who voted against certifying the election, some say.
Last week Jeffery
Clarks’ home was searched on a DOJ Inspector General (IG) warrant carried
out by Federal agents. They ousted Clark from his home, leaving him to stand on
the street in his PJs. Also, Attorney John
Eastman, mastermind of several election schemes and rally speaker, had his iPhone
seized on a Federal warrant from the DOJ IG office. Reports show the agents
used his own facial scan to unlock the phone. Well now, that no longer seems
like such a secure method, does it?
Now comes the surprise
testimony of 26-year-old Cassidy Hutchinson, a former White House aide to Chief
of Staff Mark Meadows. She spoke in a live hearing scheduled on short notice by
the Select Committee. After her testimony, we learned she had recently changed
attorneys, leaving a DJT-provided and funded lawyer, for one of her choosing
after receiving somewhat thinly veiled warnings ‘to remain a team player, to say
the correct things, and to keep in mind that if she wants to stay in DJT world,
that the former president was reading transcripts of the hearings’. In a
warning to others, Committee Vice Chair Liz Cheney spoke against witness
tampering and intimidation and asked several of those who had not given
testimony to come forward.
Her desk was in a short
corridor between Meadows’ office and the Oval Office and next to the office of
the VP. Press photos pictured her in meetings, sitting along the wall in a
meeting room, taking notes, and bringing messages. One person derisively called
her the coffee girl. Be that as it may, she was in a position to hear exchanges
among several of the major players in the White House, including attorneys,
advisors, and security staffers. At times, she was in the Oval Office for
discussions there. She was also present after DJT threw dishes across the room
or pulled the tablecloth off his dining table, scattering the remnants of a
meal across his private dining room. Hutchinson recounted assisting a White
House valet one day in wiping ketchup off the walls after the president had
thrown food. Somehow, I do not think those were duties in any of her job
descriptions. Surely, they picture a man who never should have been elected.
She overheard parts of discussions
that Meadows had with Congressmen such as Jim Jordan or Minority Leader McCarthy.
She described escorting Rudy Giuliani from the White House and being told that
January 6th would be wild. Later, asking Meadows about it, she was
told that some bad things might be happening. On January 5th Meadows
planned to go join Bannon, Giuliani, and others in the Willard Hotel ‘War Room’;
she said she discouraged that; he ended up calling into the meeting.
There were lengthy
discussions about the speech the president would give before the rally; the
attorneys kept telling him to tone it down. Hutchinson attended the rally and
was backstage before it started. There she heard the president arguing with
security about the crowd. He wanted more people allowed into the protected area
so the cameras would see a good crowd. The Secret Service said many people did
not want to go through the magnetometers where weapons were being confiscated.
DC police already had reports of marchers with bayonets fixed to flagpoles,
armed men in trees, and marchers with AK-15s. The president reportedly told the
agents that the armed marchers were not there to harm him, let them in. It was
unclear if they obeyed his orders. He gave a speech telling his supporters “To
fight like hell because if they didn’t, they would not have a country anymore”.
In his speech, he also went after Mike Pence again.
After the march, he demanded
to be taken to the Capitol to be with the marchers, but the security agents
refused to do so, citing the danger and the unruliness of the armed mob.
Hutchinson reported that the security detail told a story about the president
becoming enraged in the secure SUV and becoming physical with the agents while
trying to turn the vehicle, which finally brought him back to the West Wing.
As the day went on, she gave
testimony about the many advisers and family trying to get the president to
call off the mob. She reported, as others have, that the president was unmoved
at the calls to “hang Mike Pence”, saying he probably deserved them. When he
finally sent out a tweet, he further fanned the flames.
I will not recount all of
her testimony here, but her reports are of a man clearly out of control
listening to none of his advisors or family members; a man who could not
concede an election he knew he had lost. Cassidy Hutchinson, like many before
her, came to Washington as an intern. She was the first in her family to go to
college; she had dreams about serving her country. Before she became the
assistant to Meadows, she worked in the offices of Steve Scalise and Ted Cruz. She
was a conservative Republican. Yet she also described in her truth-telling way,
her disillusionment with those leading the country; how could they approve of attacking
the Capitol? To her, those actions were un-American. To her, this meant that
she had a duty to set the record straight, to tell the truth as she saw and
overheard it.
We are all in her gratitude
and salute her courage in coming forward.
‘Til next week-Peace!
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are reviewed prior to posting.