The news lately seems to spin by at warp speed.
Last week, the monumental news was that Fox News company
settled the lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems for 850 + million
dollars. Although it was far less than what had been requested, they still
settled for a significant sum. This week, the Network fired the most popular
host on its evening opinion/news programs, Tucker Carlson. News reports note
that not only is he being sued by a former program associate for sexist and
misogynist speech and actions, but he also made some crude and inappropriate
remarks about company officials in emails. The company emails, which were
publicized by Dominion, with some portions redacted, played an important role
in the lawsuit. The NY
Times reported the board got to see the unredacted portions after the
settlement and felt that continuing to have a host with this history was
untenable. He received notice of his firing last weekend, between shows, so he
did not have airway access to give his view.
I never watched Tucker, but I have read about him. He is a
multimillionaire and will not be impoverished by losing his job. His family
inheritance from the Swanson Frozen food business ensured that he would have a lifelong,
steady source of income. He ran his show from a studio in far-off Maine where
he could be safe from all the threatening entities he railed against nightly.
During the former administration, he often served as a trumpet for DJT and his
policies, giving the former president an unquestioned presence on his shows. He
produced a fake documentary about January 6th, where he claimed the
insurrectionists were just tourists visiting the nation's Capitol. House
Speaker Kevin McCarthy gave him the raw Capitol Police footage from that day
(without approval from the police) so that Carlson could continue to select footage
and promote his propaganda.
Over time, his show supported Russians in Ukraine,
oligarchs, and authoritarians and claimed that immigrants, Antifa, and Black
militants were coming for his viewers in their neighborhoods, maybe even their
beds. He often spoke about the great replacement theory, which he claimed meant
that Democrats supported the illegal immigration of black and brown people to
promote the displacement of the majority white population. By continuing to
speak these lies, he promoted racial disunity, and disillusionment with the
American Dream and advocated for autocracy.
Some pundits suggested Carlson has enough money to start a
news outlet of his own, run for office or join an established outfit such as
News Max. He may just bide his time and see how the Republican race is going
and decide if to weigh in. He could wait to see what happens with all the legal
actions in the future for DJT. To my knowledge, he has not made public comments
about his firing or the suit by his former assistant.
There are many, including me, who will not miss him and his
contempt for democracy and who hope that he just fades away, although we are
not holding our breath waiting for that to happen. His TV slot might well be
filled by someone equally bad, but one who does not yet have a following.
Rupert Murdoch may be 92, but he is still a Conservative who has meddled in the
politics and news of three different nations (his native Australia, the UK, and
now America) for most of his life, much to their collective dismay.
In other news, President
Biden, to little surprise, announced the beginning of the 2024 Biden-Harris
campaign this week. His theme combined the continued fight for Democracy and
the Soul of America with finishing up the job his team has started. He can tout
his infrastructure bill, the chips legislation, and the prescription drug plan
changes, for Insulin and other prescription drugs and other legislation and
executive orders. He can point out the administration's support for abortion
services and Mifepristone access. He cannot say that he has solved the
immigration issue. His leadership in Ukraine has been outstanding. Currently,
he is working with a recalcitrant House that produced a draconian budget, with
severe cuts to domestic and foreign spending. The Center for American Progress,
a progressive think-tank, described the cuts here:
Biden stated the debt ceiling is not an issue for bargaining; the budget can
be.
This proposal is the Republican plan to hold raising the
debt ceiling hostage to budget agreements. However, Senate Leader, Chuck
Schumer, called this plan dead on arrival in the Senate, so a stalemate seems
looming. Sadly, there appear to be few statesmen on the Republican side who
could step up and bring order to this posturing and chaos. Politicians,
administration officials, from this and other eras, Treasury officials, and
others cannot seem to convince the poorly informed members that the budget and
the deficit are separate. One deals with past spending and paying bills already
incurred, while the other looks at proposed future spending. The latter is a
negotiated matter; the former should be a routine approval and not tied to
politics. Minority Leader McConnell has returned from rehab following his
injury but states he is staying out of the discussions this time. Under the
former president, Congress raised the debt ceiling three times without all of
this nonsense.
Meanwhile, the Treasury is moving money around and buying
time for the eventual decisions on this issue. Our Allies, including Ukraine,
do not know what to expect about financial agreements already made. Will we
keep them? The Stock Market also is concerned about a 'never happening', a
default by the United States on its financial obligations. Someone has to blink
here.
Although a recent poll shows Americans think Biden, at age
80, is too old for the office, his potential opponent at 76 is not so
young, either, and seems to be less fit. People have increasingly viewed
DeSantis as thin-skinned and lacking people skills, making him not a viable
candidate in the eyes of many, even though he is much younger. The President
has used Vice-President Kamala Harris to advocate for the administration on the
issues of women and minority rights and sent her to foreign capitals and
international meetings as a spokesperson, so she is gaining credence on both
domestic and international matters.
The investigations into the criminal and civil violations
by the former president continue. The DOJ January 6th investigation
heard testimony for several hours from former VP
Mike Pence, even though his former boss tried to halt it. Pence, himself,
tried to make questioning about his duties in certifying the election
off-limits, and partially succeeded in that matter. Some think that special prosecutor
Jack Smith is getting ever closer to indictments. Meanwhile, Fulton County Prosecutor
Fani Willis notified local law enforcement that she expects to release
indictments that might cause unrest in the upcoming July to September Grand
Jury session. There have been concerns about her previous announcement that an
indictment was imminent in January. However, an attorney for the illegal
special electors in Georgia may have had some issues with communication with
her clients and potential conflicts. These concerns may have delayed court
proceedings.
Congressman Jim Jordan got a little mileage with his
hearing on Staten Island, so he has returned to Washington, where he is trying
to compel a former prosecutor in Alvin Bragg's office to testify to his
committee. He is also attempting to determine just what information the office
has that could make DJT's actions felonies. The attorneys should get most of
that information under discovery, but maybe Jordan doesn't understand that.
The civil trial from a claim by writer E.
Jean Carroll that the former president raped her back in the 90s is ongoing
this week without him in attendance so far. When, after the "Me too"
movement, she wrote a book about her experience; he called her a liar. But because
he was still in office, Attorney General (and private fixer) Bill Barr ruled he
was immune from being sued for his remarks. But after he left office, both he
and one of his sons repeatedly called her statements false. When I listened to
reports of the incident from the court hearing, it again struck me how it is
the woman who comes forth with such claims that is put on trial instead of the
perpetrator. She was 52 when this happened and is now 79 years old. I find she
is quite courageous to come forward.
Also, in the news this week was the report that entertainer
and activist Harry Belafonte
died at 96. He was active during the era of the marches with Dr. King and others
for voting rights and got many Hollywood stars involved. He paid bail money for
jailed marchers and donated much of his wealth to the issues of civil rights.
He was passionate and tried to make America a better country for all. I was
lucky enough to have seen him twice in performance as a singer and still
applaud his talent and leadership.
‘Til next week-Peace!
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are reviewed prior to posting.